DevelopingSafety

Reuters: Anthropic and OpenAI sought control over what outside AI evaluators publish

Reuters, citing two unnamed sources, reports Anthropic and OpenAI sought significant control over what outside evaluators can publish, citing trade-secret worries. Anthropic says new evaluators face sign-off rights; OpenAI says it redacts but does not approve full reports. Reuters says talks with some evaluators shifted by Oct. 8.

HEAT
OUTLETS: 4
NEW IN 6H: +1
FIRST SEEN: Oct 13, 2026, 08:10 ET
LAST SIGNAL: 2h ago

Primary source

Reuters (via BNN Bloomberg)bnnbloomberg.ca/business/artificial-intelligence/2026/10/13/behind-ai-industrys-call-for-independent-reviews-a-fight-over-what-gets-made-public-reuters-exclusive/

Coverage · 5 articles, oldest first

Tuesday, October 13, 2026

08:10
Reuters
Sources: Anthropic and OpenAI have pushed for substantial control over what external AI evaluators can publish, out of concern that trade secrets could leak
08:10
Finimize
finimize.com/content/ai-safety-evaluators-are-pushing-back-on-lab-edits
12:06
Reuters (via BNN Bloomberg)Primary
Reuters: Anthropic and OpenAI sought control over what outside AI evaluators publish
14:10
PYMNTS.com
pymnts.com/news/artificial-intelligence/2026/ai-labs-having-second-thoughts-on-independent-safety-evaluations/
17:40
The Deep View
thedeepview.com/articles/why-hundreds-of-ai-researchers-want-stronger-sandboxes

ShareX LinkedIn Hacker News Email

← The whole wire